The Copyright Conundrum, Part 2

Last October I published a post called The Copyright Conundrum. I shared some of my experiences of once upon a time being a "newbie" quilter and being completely ignorant of copyright laws and ethics. I wrote that post primarily to help students meander through the confusing issues surrounding the use of photographs taken by other people as a basis for their quilts. I believe most copyright violations occur simply out of ignorance and not malice. I am following up on that first post at this time because Canadian Artist, Anna Hergert, published some great articles about copyright last week, and I would like to link to them.. The first of her posts encompasses an article she wrote in the Spring 2013 issue of the Canadian Quilter, plus some additional commentary. In the second post she goes into more depth, and shares some of her own personal experiences related to original, derivative and copied work. There is a lively and informative discussion going on over at her blog.

I've had a few questions from students about copyright issues related to the use of patterns. I would like to address patterns today, and move on to original work in my next post. I think the simplest and most basic thing I have to say with regard to working with patterns is that if you have purchased the pattern or found it in a magazine or book, and you are making the quilt for your own personal use or as a gift, you have no reason to fear copyright at all. Copyright issues only arise if you decide to photocopy a copyrighted pattern for your friends, if you decide to sell or exhibit a quilt made from a copyrighted pattern, or if you teach a class based on someone else's pattern.

If you are Canadian I recommend checking out copyright guidelines by Kathleen Bissett on the Canadian Quilter website, as well as Anna's posts. I also received some guidelines from the American Quilters Association in my mailbox this week.  You can check those out here.

I don't use other people's patterns to make my work and I do not make my living from designing and selling patterns, so I don't pay as much attention to the laws governing copyright and patterns. The above links should answer most of your questions. I do provide patterns in two of the classes I give because it is a great way to learn the method in one day, but I also explain in the classes how you can design your own.

While conducting research to write this blog post, I came upon some very ugly discussions about copyright on-line. The subject seems to cause a lot of strong feelings to be expressed on both sides of the issue. A lot of people feel that the entire quilt community has historically been organized around the copying and sharing of ideas. That may still be the case to some extent, but the quilt world has changed so much (hasn't everything?). It is wonderful that some people are able to make a living, or at least part of their living, in a field they love.Without the designers who share their creativity and beautiful works, quilters today could not have the plethora of patterns and designs available to them. As a professional myself, you can probably see which side of the issue I sit on. I think the quilt world is doing a fabulous job though of educating quilters who want to exhibit their work in shows, just what they need to do to respect copyright laws. The answer there is simple: give credit where credit is due. So much about copyright comes down to being able to put ourselves in someone else's shoes and seeing the world from where they sit.


Now here's how I feel about work made from my patterns and work started in workshops with me. I don't care if you sell the piece or show the piece. However, if you do so, it would be very much appreciated if you gave credit to me as the pattern designer and the workshop instructor. In fact, most shows require this anyway (as you will find in the guidelines I shared above). Once you start exhibiting at shows beyond your own local guild, you will actually find that many of them do not accept works made from patterns or started in workshops.

I also have no problem with guilds or shops, or groups I'm teaching for, sharing photos of my work on their websites and blogs for the purposes of  promoting lectures and workshops, or even sharing about the events afterward. As long as my name is associated with the photos this is good publicity for my lectures and classes. I suppose some teachers and artists might object, so it is always a good idea to ask.

For those of you designing your own quilts or aspiring to designing your own quilts, stay tuned for Part 3.

The Copyright Conundrum

During the years I completed my university degree, I was a mature student in my mid-twenties, completing my studies while being employed full-time.  I remember distinctly my experience writing my first essay for my first year Anthropology class.  In this paper I paraphrased several sources, but completely ignorant of the importance of correct source citation, I did not credit many of the works I consulted for the information I used to write the essay.  I was horrified when my essay was returned covered with comments in pen.  The Teaching Assistant who marked my paper was quite harsh in his comments, and advised that I needed to learn about proper source citation.  He finished his comments by adding that he could have easily given me 0 for the paper.  However, he decided to give me the benefit of the doubt and assume it was out of ignorance and not malice, that I had failed at crediting my sources.  Let me tell you, I quickly did research to find out how to reference ideas and quotes.  This never happened to me again.

What does this have to do with art quilts?  Well I think the copyright issues that art quilters face are very similar.  When I started making what I thought were "art" quilts about 12 years ago, I was woefully ignorant of copyright issues.  Many of us were making quilts out of art or photos we found on greeting cards, on the internet, in magazines, etc.  I admit I also violated copyright.  Here is the most obvious violation.  I purchased a greeting card called "Friendship", which featured two very heavy women leading each other through a lake.  I traced the design onto a transparency film, enlarged it and made this quilt:

I named it "Clarissa and Jennifer", after the two hosts of the British cooking show "Two Fat Ladies".  Only a couple of years later I started learning more about copyright, and also realized that this work is not an art quilt.  It might be a contemporary quilt (in that it doesn't look like a traditional quilt, but it is a copy of another art work, so in my books it isn't art).  The right thing to do would have been to contact the artist and ask her permission to recreate her art work in fabric, and then credit her on the label and on my website.  If the artist had said no, I would have had to abandon the idea. The image was not mine to take.

 

I have noticed in the last couple of years that quilters are becoming very savvy about copyright issues.  Most shows now typically require quilters to credit the pattern designer, the teacher (if the piece was created in a class), the photographer (if a photo was used), the machine or hand quilters (if someone else quilted the work).  Today I taught my two-day "In Full Bloom" class where students bring a floral photograph and design their own quilt.  I had advised the class ahead of time that they must obtain copyright permission from the photographer if they were using a photo taken by someone else.  We had a great discussion on copyright today, and I was really pleased to see such a savvy group of quilters who were well-versed in copyright.

 

I now use the quilt above (in which I violated copyright) as an educational tool during my lectures.  Many times people in my audience are aghast that one cannot just take a photo off the internet or a greeting card and do what they want with it.  I start hearing the "buts".  In fact, I once taught a class where everyone in the class argued with me about copyright except for one person.  That one person happened to have a husband who is a photographer.  As a professional photographer, and an artist, when he puts his portfolio out on the internet to get business, he does not appreciate people just "taking" his work without asking and without credit.  Looks a lot different when you are on the other side of the issue, doesn't it?  We can all imagine how we would feel if someone copied our original quilt and didn't even give us credit, not to mention didn't even ask us.

I hear a lot of misconceptions out there about copyright, but it is most surprising when I find these misconceptions circulating among artists and fibre artists, who I don't think seem to be getting the same kind of education about copyright as quilters.  Because galleries don't expect artists to be copying their work from someone else, they often don't even have a mechanism for the artist to even give credit to whoever or whatever they copied.

 

Here are some of the excuses and misinformation I often hear about copyright:

 

1)  If I change mediums it is OK.  In other words, if I copy someone's painting into fabric, there is no copyright violation.  WRONG  The right thing to do is to contact the artist for permission.  If permission is not granted, you can't create the work.  There are certain artworks that are now in the public domain if the artist has been dead for more than a specified number of years (I have forgotten the number now but it isn't important to me because I don't base my work on these works).

 

2)  If the piece is made for my own use, and I never show or sell the work I've copied, there is no copyright violation.  WRONG AGAIN.  It is true that if no one ever sees your work, you are not in danger of being sued, but what I often see is that if the work turns out really well, the maker wants to show and/or sell it.  Then it is too late to get copyright permission.  What if the photographer says no?  I spoke with an intellectual property lawyer (who is also a quilter) and she told me that some lawyers might interpret "personal use" to still be a violation.  What concerns me now is that if I don't warn students about copyright and they use a photo without permission, then decide to enter their piece in a show, and credit me as the teacher, if there is any fall-out, I could be implicated as well. 

 

3)  It is OK if I only copy a certain percentage of someone else's artwork/photo.  Wrong again.  There should not be issues if you are only using the photo as a jumping off point, where the end piece doesn't look anything like the photo (i.e. you use the colours, or perhaps one shape but run in a new direction with it).  But actually copying a piece and changing only some of it, or copying the piece in other colours is still a violation.

 

4)  In Art School, students copy the Master's works.  TRUE, and I've done this in art classes BUT these are PRACTICE pieces to learn the methods, but are never meant to be exhibited or sold. 

 

5)  There is nothing new out there, everything has been seen and done.  This to me is an excuse.  When a professional photographer takes a photo, captures a beautiful composition, captures the light, and often the character of the person, flower, landscape, I think this makes the artist's job easier to recreate the photo, so I strongly believe that photographer should be credited (and asked for permission) for their contribution to the finished work.

 

4)  Well I really am not much of a photographer.  OK, but you can learn to take your own photos if it is important to your art.  Don't you want it to be YOUR ART? That is what I decided to do when I decided I wanted my work to be my own vision and experience and I didn't want to deal with copyright issues.  There are many wonderful cameras out there, even in the point and shoot category.  Besides that it is fun to be working on your art wherever you go by carrying a camera.  And even if you don't take your own photographs, it is usually very easy to find the photographer and contact them to ask permission.

 

There is one more thing I want to say.  There are some artists out there that think we shouldn't be working from photographs at all.  I once posed a copyright question to an on-line group I belong to, and received back some good information along with some of the above misinformation, but I also received criticism from several artists about the kind of work that results from using photographs as inspiration.  It seems that some look down on this kind of art.  A battle ensued on that list, from which some of us are still licking our wounds.

 

I'd love to hear from you!  What are your experiences with copyright?  Please feel free to post.

 

And just for something gorgeous ... today while I was out teaching, my husband was in Gatineau Park photographing autumn leaves.  Alas I will not make it there this year because my teaching seems to be falling on the few sunny days we've had, and I'm heading to Northern Ontario on Tuesday.  I hope there are some leaves left there!  Some of my husband's photos are stunning, but this one really caught my eye.  Can you not imagine the reflections of these trees stitched with a dense zig zag stitch.  Oh and by the way, I did ask his permission to post this (although some would say that all is fair in love ;-))).